Radiographic positioning- Bony Thorax

Posted on

*Upright Sternum-Lateral; http://youtu.be/IjOC6yhHE-s

*Sternum lateral; http://youtu.be/HUmTk1xdQNw

*Ribs-AP,AP Oblique; http://youtu.be/woX5NBx46Vo

*Ribs PA Upper&Lower,PA Oblique; http://youtu.be/bB8-sScM24s

 

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Radiographic positioning- Bony Thorax

    congress insights said:
    August 14, 2014 at 11:38 am

    Wow, great article post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.
    congress insights

    Driver resume said:
    August 14, 2014 at 5:14 am

    Thanks a lot for the article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
    truck driver resume

    social media marketing expert said:
    August 13, 2014 at 3:05 pm

    Major thanks for the blog.Thanks Again. Want more.
    organic seo

    Driver resume said:
    August 12, 2014 at 6:25 am

    I really enjoy the article.Much thanks again. Cool.
    Driver resume

    print services said:
    August 11, 2014 at 12:30 pm

    Thank you ever so for you article post.Thanks Again. Awesome.
    post it dispenser

    ar parts said:
    August 8, 2014 at 3:39 am

    I cannot thank you enough for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
    ar parts

    dal sol organization said:
    August 7, 2014 at 11:30 am

    Thank you for your blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…
    dal sol organization

    GSM said:
    August 7, 2014 at 4:47 am

    Thanks so much for the blog article.Really thank you! Fantastic.
    nju mobile forum

    H Pylori Symptoms said:
    August 6, 2014 at 6:32 am

    Really enjoyed this blog article.Really thank you! Cool.
    H Pylori Symptoms

    Pool Cues said:
    August 6, 2014 at 2:13 am

    Thanks a lot for the article post.Thanks Again. Will read on…
    Pool Sticks

    Vollara Living Water Machine said:
    August 5, 2014 at 10:32 am

    Im thankful for the article post. Want more.
    Click Here For Video

    Golf holidays Spain said:
    August 5, 2014 at 4:37 am

    A big thank you for your article post.Much thanks again. Awesome.
    Golf breaks in Spain

    econs tuition said:
    August 4, 2014 at 12:15 pm

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.
    econs

    design cameretta neonato said:
    August 4, 2014 at 1:34 am

    I really like and appreciate your blog article. Will read on…
    cameretta design bambini

    hvac parts said:
    August 1, 2014 at 9:09 am

    Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Really thank you! Will read on…
    hvac parts

    best 7 inch tablet said:
    July 30, 2014 at 3:57 pm

    Fantastic blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.
    best tablet for the money

    Ross Dibblee said:
    February 10, 2014 at 7:28 pm

    Buying a professional sports team

    Radiology news said:
    February 28, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    Structured CCTA reports provide clearer count of vessels with stenosis

    By Evan GodtFeb 27, 2013

    – Doctors Reviewing Data
    Structured impressions on a coronary CT angiography (CCTA) report improved interpretation agreement with regard to the number of vessels with significant stenosis compared with free-form impressions, according to a study published online Feb. 27 in the Journal of the American College of Radiology .

    Using structured reports decreased the tendency of clinicians to overestimate non-significant stenosis, according to authors Brian B. Ghoshhajra, MD, MBA, and colleagues from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

    “The utility of [CCTA] relies on precise reporting and accurate result interpretation,” wrote the authors. “Given the rapid development in cardiac imaging and thus evolving terminologies, effective communication between cardiac imaging specialists and referring clinicians is critical to facilitate correct integration of radiological evidence into clinical decision making.”

    CCTA reports at Massachusetts General Hospital follow a structured format for most sections, explained the authors. The impression section, however, was traditionally a free-form summary where the most clinically relevant items could be conveyed.

    In an effort to further improve and standardize reporting, an impression template was implemented that included a description of patients’ stenosis according to the six standard categories laid out by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography—normal, minimal stenosis, mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, severe stenosis and occluded.

    To assess referring clinicians’ understanding of patients’ coronary artery disease (CAD) severity using the template, 50 clinical CCTA reports from May 2011 to April 2012 were retrospectively selected for review, half of which contained structured impressions and half of which contained free-form impressions.

    Four cardiologists and two cardiac imaging specialists were given a survey containing only the randomized blinded impressions, and interpretations were examined regarding three questions:

    1.Worst stenosis severity
    2.Number of vessels with significant stenosis
    3.The presences of non-evaluable segments.
    Results showed Question 2 was most affected by the structured impressions, with agreement on the number of vessels with significant stenosis improving from fair to moderate compared with free-form impressions. Agreement proportions were 53 percent and 68 percent for free-form and structured impressions, respectively.

    Agreement on Question 1 was excellent for both types of impressions, and moderate for both types on Question 3, according to Ghoshhajra and colleagues. They noted that satisfaction was generally high and similar for both free-from and structured impression sections, though imaging specialists, compared with referring clinicians, expressed higher levels of satisfaction.

    Ghoshhajra and colleagues concluded that while structured impressions improved interpretations with regard to the number of vessels with significant stenosis, room for improvement still exists to optimize wording of CCTA reports.
    ….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s